AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Blender Tested on Geekbench 5
With the official launch of AMD’s Ryzen 7000X3D CPU household approaching, the efficiency of the brand new Ryzen 9 7950X3D flagship processor has been revealed in a number of well-liked benchmarks. On Friday, the brand new chip appeared in Blender (by way of HXL) and Geekbench 5 (by way of @benchleaks) benchmark suites. Nevertheless, we can not say that we’re impressed with the efficiency of the brand new 3D V-Cache CPU in comparison with its counterpart with out further L3 in these exams.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Header Cell – Column 0 | Worth (MSRP / Retail) | Cores / Subjects | Base / Increase Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | $699 / ? | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | 144MB (16+128) | 120W / 162W |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | $599 / $589 | 16 / 32 | 4.5 / 5.7 | 80MB (16+64) | 170W / 230W |
mixer
Blender is a instrument for creating animations and visible results. Like different rendering and video modifying packages, it takes benefit of multi-threaded efficiency and single-threaded efficiency, together with application-specific optimizations.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Header Cell – Column 0 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 7950X | Core i9-13900K | Apple M2 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common options | 16C/32T, 4.20 GHz to five.70 GHz, 144MB L2+L3 | 16C/32T, 4.20 GHz to five.70 GHz, 80MB L2+L3 | 8P+16E/32T, 3.0 GHz to five.80 GHz, 68MB L2+L3 cache | 8P + 4E as much as 3.67 GHz |
| mixer | 558.59 | 590.28 | 557.17 | 254.06 |
The 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X3D with 144MB of L2+L3 cache seems 5.4% slower in Blender than the 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X with 80MB of L2+L3 cache. In the meantime, the 7950X3D is barely quicker than Intel’s Core i9-13900K (8P+16E, 32-thread) and considerably quicker than Apple’s 12-core M2 Max.
The upcoming Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 16 high-performance cores that assist simultaneous multi-threading (i.e. processing of 32 threads concurrently) working as much as 5.70 GHz. So it is no shock that it beats Apple’s 12-core M2 Max (3.67 GHz) and is barely quicker than Intel’s flagship CPU, which may deal with 32 simultaneous threads. It needs to be famous that the Core i9-13900K can not run its energy-efficient cores at a clock pace larger than 4.30 GHz.
In the meantime, the Ryzen 7950X3D’s core chip die (CCD) with a further 64MB of 3D V-Cache is seemingly clocked slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X, lowering the advantages of a bigger cache for single-threaded efficiency.
Geekbench 5
Geekbench 5 is an artificial benchmark that measures single-threaded and multi-threaded efficiency throughout totally different workloads. This program isn’t thought-about the optimum benchmark for CPUs and GPUs for a lot of causes, but it surely nonetheless provides an concept of the efficiency of various {hardware} below related workloads.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Header Cell – Column 0 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 7950X | Core i9-13900K | Apple M2 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common options | 16C/32T, 4.20 GHz to five.70 GHz, 144MB L2+L3 | 16C/32T, 4.20 GHz to five.70 GHz, 80MB L2+L3 | 8P+16E/32T, 3.0 GHz to five.80 GHz, 68MB L2+L3 cache | 8P + 4E as much as 3.67 GHz |
| Single Core | integer | 1783 | 1838 | 2016 | 1882 |
| Single Core | swimming with out sinking | 2265 | 2302 | 2464 | 2216 |
| Single Core | Crypto | 6375 | 7219 | 5860 | 3283 |
| Single Core | Aim | 2157 | 2246 | 2343 | 2052 |
| Line 5 – Cell 0 | Row 5 – Cell 1 | Line 5 – Cell 2 | Row 5 – Cell 3 | Line 5 – Cell 4 |
| Multi-Core | integer | 21473 | 25087 | 28379 | 13353 |
| Multi-Core | swimming with out sinking | 24372 | 27790 | 31320 | 16819 |
| Multi-Core | Crypto | 11445 | 12632 | 22280 | 25911 |
| Multi-Core | Aim | 21841 | 25275 | 28956 | 15021 |
| Connection | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/20655028 | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/20574320 | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/20655426 | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/20650321 |
AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X3D with 3D V-Cache seems to be barely slower on single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads than the Ryzen 9 7950X with out the additional cache.
Concerning frequencies, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D pattern examined on the Asus ROG Crosshair X670E Hero labored roughly 5480MHz usually with a balanced energy plan. By the way in which, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X on the identical motherboard labored fairly a bit higher frequencies with the identical balanced energy plan, perhaps that is why the CPU with out 3D V-Cache is quicker in Geekbench 5.
some ideas
In fact, we can not draw correct conclusions based mostly on check outcomes from one or two pre-production techniques. Nevertheless, we will nonetheless share a few of our ideas on the outcomes out there.
The primary benefit of AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU over its Ryzen 9 7950X counterpart is a a lot bigger L3 cache. In the meantime, the older processor has larger base frequency and better enhance clocks. all nuclei; at the least in line with the outcomes obtained in Blender and Geekbench 5 it appears so. Clocks are extra vital in lots of packages than cache sizes, so the 7950X3D lags behind the 7950X in these benchmarks.
For purposes that rely totally on single-thread efficiency And Reminiscence bandwidth, Zen 4-based processors with 3D V-Cache will exhibit important benefits over their counterparts with out an additional L3 cache.
Taking into consideration that AMD’s Ryzen 7000X3D CPUs are a couple of weeks away, it is sensible to attend for the intensive opinions and study all the main points in regards to the professionals and cons of the brand new processors in comparison with common Ryzen 7000 sequence items.
#AMD #Ryzen #7950X3D #Blender #Examined #Geekbench
